Mongolian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Ethiopia
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.68%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 33.7% |
| Range | 43.6% | 24.3% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 19.6% |
| Median | 19.2% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |