Mongolian vs Immigrants from South Africa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from South Africa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from South Africa
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from South Africa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,419,478 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 20.1%, a difference of 0.19%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 3.5% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 47.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.6% | 95.3% |
Mean | 19.9% | 31.9% |
Median | 19.2% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 35.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from South Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |