Mongolian vs Sioux Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Sioux
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Sioux
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Sioux Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,047,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 31.3%, a difference of 55.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Sioux |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 47.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.6% | 92.9% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 49.1% |
| Median | 19.2% | 43.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 64.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 35.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 24.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 24.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 2.0%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 2.8%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Crow (32.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |