Czech vs Danish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Danish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Danes
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Danish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,041,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,491,649 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Danish |
Minimum | 0.55% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 35.0% |
Range | 49.5% | 33.7% |
Mean | 9.5% | 11.7% |
Median | 8.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Danes by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |