Czech vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Czech
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Czechs
Chickasaw
85.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,299,393 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 85.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 72.8% | 54.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 27.2% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 89.8% | 80.6% |
| Median | 88.7% | 79.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 85.6% | 73.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.4% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Czechs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Russian (85.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Filipino (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Soviet Union | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 85.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |