Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Oceania
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.94% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 30.3% |
Range | 32.2% | 29.6% |
Mean | 9.5% | 10.9% |
Median | 8.0% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |