Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Northern Africa
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,660,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 0.94% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 30.2% |
Range | 32.2% | 28.1% |
Mean | 9.5% | 11.2% |
Median | 8.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |