Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
12.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,645,170 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 38.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 0.73% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 30.3% |
| Range | 52.6% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 10.9% |
| Median | 15.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ute by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Hispanic or Latino (12.0%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Guatemala (12.0%, a difference of 0.84%), Immigrants from Caribbean (12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Seminole (11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 12.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |