Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Oceania
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,522,018 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 25.5% | 30.3% |
Range | 24.2% | 29.6% |
Mean | 8.5% | 10.9% |
Median | 8.0% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |