Immigrants from Ukraine vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ukraine
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ukraine
Immigrants from Oceania
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,107,517 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,831,685 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ukraine | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 30.3% |
Range | 38.0% | 29.6% |
Mean | 10.5% | 10.9% |
Median | 7.8% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine and Immigrants from Oceania by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Kuwait (8.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |