Costa Rican vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Celtics
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.2% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 12.7% |
| Median | 8.0% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Iraq (9.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |