Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Tsimshian
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.94% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 22.7% |
Range | 32.2% | 18.9% |
Mean | 9.5% | 9.9% |
Median | 8.0% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |