Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Chile
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Chile
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 0.94% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 15.0% |
Range | 32.2% | 14.0% |
Mean | 9.5% | 9.0% |
Median | 8.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Iraq (9.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |