Immigrants from Sudan vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Celtics
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,923,711 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 14.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 30.0% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.7% |
| Median | 9.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |