Costa Rican vs Celtic Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Celtic
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Celtics
12.2%
POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
POVERTY
50.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Celtic Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,487,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,616 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Celtic |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 39.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.4% | 98.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 14.3% |
Median | 10.2% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Celtics by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Nepal (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Lebanese (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Portugal (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Spain (12.3%, a difference of 0.11%), South American (12.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (12.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 56.5 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 12.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 54.6 /100 | #170 | Average 12.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 50.5 /100 | #172 | Average 12.3% |
Celtics | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 12.3% |
Lebanese | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 12.3% |
South Americans | 48.7 /100 | #175 | Average 12.3% |