Immigrants from Belarus vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Celtics
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 24.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 22.9% | 97.2% |
Mean | 8.1% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.1% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |