Immigrants from Israel vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chickasaw
9.6%
MALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,033,213 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 58.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 56.8% |
Range | 33.5% | 50.1% |
Mean | 10.1% | 22.9% |
Median | 9.3% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 24.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (9.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from China (9.5%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Bolivian (9.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and Iranian (9.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |