Sudanese vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Chickasaw
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,141,954 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 37.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 56.8% |
| Range | 16.7% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 22.9% |
| Median | 11.1% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Kenyan (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 76.4 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 75.1 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Cubans | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 74.4 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 73.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 72.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 70.9 /100 | #155 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |