Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chickasaw
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 42.9%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 56.8% |
| Range | 25.0% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |