Immigrants vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Costa Ricans
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.86%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 18.7% |
| Range | 18.8% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |