Immigrants from Kenya vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Costa Ricans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,037,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 18.7% |
Range | 14.6% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.9% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |