Immigrants from Poland vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Costa Ricans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.72%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 2.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 18.7% |
Range | 14.7% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |