Immigrants from Netherlands vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Netherlands
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Netherlands
Costa Ricans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Netherlands vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,838,654 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Netherlands | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 18.7% |
Range | 15.5% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.3% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Netherlands and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |