Immigrants vs Immigrants from Uruguay Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Uruguay
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Uruguay
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Uruguay Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Uruguay |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 12.7% |
| Range | 18.8% | 9.2% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Uruguay by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |