Czech vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechs
Costa Ricans
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 32.8% | 18.7% |
Range | 31.6% | 16.8% |
Mean | 7.7% | 6.3% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |