Immigrants vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Western Asia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Western Asia
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.52%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 12.5% |
Range | 18.8% | 9.3% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Western Asia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |