Immigrants vs South American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
South American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
South American Indians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs South American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | South American Indian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 15.9% |
Range | 18.8% | 14.2% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and South American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |