Immigrants from Sudan vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
South American Indians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,961,882 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.74%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 22.1% | 27.7% |
Range | 17.5% | 23.4% |
Mean | 10.7% | 13.3% |
Median | 10.2% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |