Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Chickasaw
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 39.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 29.7% |
Range | 10.0% | 28.2% |
Mean | 5.8% | 12.1% |
Median | 5.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |