Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 39.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 23.8% | 29.7% |
Range | 21.4% | 28.2% |
Mean | 6.8% | 12.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |