Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 30.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 29.7% |
Range | 13.9% | 28.2% |
Mean | 7.0% | 12.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |