Creek vs Welsh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,168,243 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Welsh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $100,322, a difference of 27.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $93,039, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $102,151, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,597, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $37,856, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.74%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 7th grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.6%).