Creek vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Jordanians

Fair
Exceptional
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,597,620 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Jordanians.
Creek Integration in Jordanian Communities

Creek vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $109,376, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $91,794, a difference of 35.6%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $109,865, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $64,313, a difference of 23.8%).
Creek vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricCreekJordanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.8%

Creek vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 58.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.2%).
Creek vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekJordanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.2%

Creek vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Creek vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekJordanian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%

Creek vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Creek vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Creek vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 31.7%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Creek vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekJordanian
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
28.5%

Creek vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.9%).
Creek vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Creek vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Creek vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.0%

Creek vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.3%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%).
Creek vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricCreekJordanian
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%