Creek vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,888,256 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $44,735, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,374, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $33,291, a difference of 0.44%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $68,461, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $34,910, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 72.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 63.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 10.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 74.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.8%).