Cambodian vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Pima
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,836,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.302% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 302.0 Pima.
Cambodian vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $30,644, a difference of 68.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $73,365, a difference of 55.8%), and median household income ($96,324 compared to $63,262, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $35,326, a difference of 27.4%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Cambodian vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 153.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 134.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.5%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Cambodian vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 150.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 142.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Cambodian vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 72.8% |
Cambodian vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.9%), births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 92.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (61.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Cambodian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.3%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Cambodian vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 116.1%), bachelor's degree (47.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 103.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Cambodian vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 70.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |