Ute vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Cherokee
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Cherokee
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,649,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Cherokee |
Minimum | 6.5% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 64.1% | 93.1% |
Mean | 32.1% | 26.3% |
Median | 23.3% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Cherokee by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (17.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 0.48%), African (17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and Chickasaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |