Ute vs Kiowa Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Kiowa
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Kiowa
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Kiowa Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,020,339 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 10.0%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Kiowa |
Minimum | 6.5% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 50.0% |
Range | 64.1% | 38.1% |
Mean | 32.1% | 25.7% |
Median | 23.3% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 33.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 18.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Kiowa by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Paiute (19.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Yemen (19.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Cajun (19.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Apache (20.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and Creek (19.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 19.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.1% |