Ute vs Welsh Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Welsh
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Welsh
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Welsh Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,618,388 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 27.9%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Welsh |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.1% | 90.9% |
| Mean | 32.1% | 28.7% |
| Median | 23.3% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 27.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 25.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants (14.0%, a difference of 0.41%), English (13.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Germany (13.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 24.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.9% |
| Scottish | 23.6 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 21.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 20.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.9% |
| English | 20.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 20.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 17.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 14.0% |
| Welsh | 17.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 14.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 14.0% |
| Hawaiians | 13.6 /100 | #204 | Poor 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 13.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.1% |
| Hungarians | 11.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.1% |
| Japanese | 11.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 11.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 14.1% |
| Guyanese | 8.6 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |