Ute vs Ottawa Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Ottawa
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Ottawa
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Ottawa Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,772,862 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 4.5%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 0.24% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 47.6% |
| Range | 64.1% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 32.1% | 21.8% |
| Median | 23.3% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Ottawa by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are African (17.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (17.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Chickasaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |