Ute vs Jordanian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Jordanian
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Jordanians
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Jordanian Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,610,888 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 48.0%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Jordanian |
Minimum | 6.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 41.2% |
Range | 64.1% | 39.0% |
Mean | 32.1% | 11.7% |
Median | 23.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 8.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Luxembourger (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Russian (12.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Paraguayans | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Jordanians | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Russians | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Soviet Union | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |