Pima vs Hawaiian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Hawaiian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Pima
Hawaiians
14.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Hawaiian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,926,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 272,607,469 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Hawaiian |
Minimum | 5.6% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.6% | 98.3% |
Mean | 23.0% | 26.3% |
Median | 20.0% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 28.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 18.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Hawaiians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Indian (Asian) (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Salvadoran (14.9%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Laotian (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Laos (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (15.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (15.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 15.1% |