Celtic vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Chickasaw
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Chickasaw
18.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,202,349 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.4% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.6% | 90.0% |
Mean | 42.2% | 31.9% |
Median | 26.0% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.8% | 37.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.4% | 19.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Comanche (18.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Ute (18.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Hungarian (18.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |