Pima vs Bhutanese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Bhutanese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Pima
Bhutanese
14.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Bhutanese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,926,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,288,163 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 5.6% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 84.3% |
Range | 51.6% | 83.3% |
Mean | 23.0% | 17.6% |
Median | 20.0% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.7% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Bhutanese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Indian (Asian) (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bolivian (14.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Pakistan (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from China (14.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 15.0% |