African vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
African
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Africans
Chickasaw
21.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,760,233 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 11.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.3% | 96.2% |
Mean | 33.9% | 26.8% |
Median | 31.6% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.66%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |