Bermudan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bermudan
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bermudans
Chickasaw
18.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,609,827 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 8.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.9% | 96.2% |
Mean | 16.2% | 26.8% |
Median | 16.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Armenia (18.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cambodia (18.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (18.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |