English vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
English
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
English
Chickasaw
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 28.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.2% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.8% | 96.2% |
Mean | 28.6% | 26.8% |
Median | 17.0% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to English by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |