Arapaho vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Arapaho
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Arapaho
Chickasaw
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,694,032 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 52.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.4% | 96.7% |
Mean | 27.3% | 27.0% |
Median | 29.6% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.8% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.5% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%), West Indian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Jamaica (20.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Belize (20.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and Comanche (20.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.1% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.2% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.3% |