Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chickasaw
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,514,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 62.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.4% | 96.7% |
Mean | 20.7% | 27.0% |
Median | 18.7% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.2% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Liberia (19.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Potawatomi (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Liberian (19.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |