Immigrants from Greece vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,501,613 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 39.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Greece	Chickasaw
Minimum	2.0%	3.3%
Maximum	22.0%	100.0%
Range	20.0%	96.7%
Mean	11.3%	27.0%
Median	11.7%	23.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.1%	18.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.9%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.8%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	15.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	15.4%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%
Vietnamese	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.6%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.7%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.7%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 19.8%
Belizeans	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 19.9%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.0%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.0%