Spanish vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Spanish
Chickasaw
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,463,522 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 16.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.6% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.4% | 96.7% |
Mean | 33.7% | 27.0% |
Median | 23.9% | 23.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.1% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.9% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Spaniard (17.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uganda (17.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (17.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 21.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 21.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 21.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.0% |
Spanish | 20.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 20.5 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 19.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.1% |
Delaware | 18.8 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 16.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 13.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 13.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |